Dear Dean Tyree:
Dr. Hardin has told us that you emailed him. Thank you for acknowledging our concerns. We are interested in meeting, perhaps as a group during presidents hours, and appreciate your efforts to set up an open conversation with President Lemons. In anticipation of such a meeting, we would like to formally submit some of the issues that have been made manifest so far in the blog. In some cases, there may be a simple answer that we are not aware of, and in others, we would like to raise concerns so that President Lemons can come to the meeting fully prepared. We assume that the administration will be able to help us in a cooperative environment where all parties can be heard and acknowledged. We are posting this letter on line and forwarding to Dr. Hardin so that he can forward it to you personally. We respect your decision not to join the blog; our reasons for posting this is to let our members see that their issues are being raised, and that if we have failed to address any of them, they might add to this list or ideally, attend the open conversation with President Lemons.
Of course, you are still welcome here, and we do understand how much you care. Sometimes, however, it seems that the humanity can be lost in the bureaucracy.
Sincerely,
The DL
These issues are in no particular order.
First, could you please explain the policy and the reasoning on Blue Lights?
Second, based on the accounts of a number of the students who have posted, it seems that the school’s policy on psychological disorders and treatment needs review. It may simply be an issue of misunderstanding, but it seems counterproductive if there is a punitive element for any student seeking psychological help.
Third, create a venue for the anonymous reporting of rape, sexual assault, sexual harassment, homophobia, racism, etc. It is great that you have the new Sexual Assault Victims unit here at SU, with 10 caring faculty members, but can we extened that to victims of "hate crimes" also? This would not be intended as a legal venue for punishing the offenders, since we understand the democratic right to confront one’s accuser, but we do feel that the university needs to fully understand the extent that such issues occur in order for it to best address allocate its efforts in making this a better university.
Fourth, consider the designation of hate crime. While it might seem trivial to someone else, for a person who has been victimized because of race, sexuality, gender, etc, it is important for those who have been victimized simply for who they are that the community understand WHY it happened. What will it take to get hate crime rules in the public safety lawbook?
Fifth, address the issue of the class disparity and antagonism on campus. If the school is going to admit working class students, then it should seek to make us feel welcome, not as charity cases or in some way inferior. What can we do to raise scholarships and grants with the tuition raise?
Sixth, we need to find a real solution for the undercurrent of racial tension here. This was made quite evident last year in the school paper, and it does not seem to have been solved, merely hushed. We have no solutions, but would like to see the process toward a fully integrated SU community continue. How can we increase diversity on campus? What areas would be good to target to bring in multicultural students, and faculty.
Seventh, the blog has made it clear that our GLBT students still, in 2006, at a liberal arts university, feel that they have to remain in the closet. Part of this is the problem of the other students who make comments, threats and even hostile actions against the GLBT community; we understand that the administration is not responsible for that. However, we believe that if the administration is more visible in its active support of the GLBT community, such intolerance will have fewer spaces to hide, and the students will feel safer in voicing their fears.
Seven is a good beginning. We know this is an ambitious list, but we did not start the blog to make cosmetic changes. We want to see change. We want to feel heard. We want to know that our school cares about our lives, not just our G.P.A.s. We love this school—we wouldn’t invest so much of ourselves in the DL if we didn’t.
The DL.